[odf-discuss] Partial implementations

[Alex Hudson]

marbux wrote:
> I see that Microsoft finally a few days ago did finally adopt a
> different covenant for MOOX, the OSP. (Odd they didn't get any press
> on that one.) I have been saying all along that the Office 2003 CNS
> would not be the document used for MOOX and I was right.

Both the Office 2003 CNS *and* the OSP apply. It's a choice, but you can
accept either.

> They most certainly do not say the same thing. The CNS is unintelligible.

I think that's a bit unfair. You may not like the terms or the use of
the words "necessary" and "conform", but I have no trouble understanding
what it means - they're problems not recognised by other analysts, eg.
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060126111840467.

-- 
Alex Hudson
IT Director, Stratagia Ltd.
P: 0845 226 17 13     W: http://www.stratagia.co.uk/
F: 0845 226 17 14     E: alex (at) stratagia.co.uk