[odf-discuss] Partial implementations
Lars D. Noodén
lars at umich.edu
Fri Nov 3 10:06:58 EST 2006
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Alex Hudson wrote:
> ... but since the OpenXML spec doesn't exist yet you can hardly complain
> about the license.
The license is hardly contingent upon the completion of the standard as a
technical specification.
> I'm not sure it's that interesting a distinction anyway; if you're not
> happy with the state of the CNS, use the OSP. It's either-or, you don't
> need both, and they say basically the same thing anyway (the OSP is the
> thing that RedHat and Larry Rosen have endorsed, too,
The OSP seems to exist.
> not the CNS).
The CNS does not seem to exist. The CNS seems to cover sw patents and
from a user perspective this is more important than the OSP.
-Lars
Lars Noodén
Ensure access to your data in the future
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list