[odf-discuss] Microsoft and Novell cooperate on document formats
Thomas Zander
zander at kde.org
Fri Nov 3 04:58:19 EST 2006
On Friday 03 November 2006 10:57, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 00:47 -0800, marbux wrote:
> > As I said in an earlier post, I suspect that you too have missed
> > just how big a job it would be to fully implement MOOX in OOo.
> > Someone (Rob Weir?) recently estimated that it would take over 10
> > years to fully implement MOOX in an app other than MS Office, if
> > ever.
>
> Depends how much resource you throw at it. It seems unlikely that
> given the progress with OOo from Star Office in a considerably
> shorter time that coping with a file format would take significantly
> longer even if it meant re-engineering most of the code. If you took
> just a WP (that's an app) you could probably start from scratch and
> have a MOOX product in less a lot less than 10 years with two or
> three full-time and able developers.
I doubt that, what do you base this on?
Based on my years of actually programming on a WP app and seeing various
items in the spec, 10 years sounds plausible.
--
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061103/1ef5af04/attachment-0002.pgp
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list