[odf-discuss] IDC compares MS XML and ODF

[Daniel Carrera]

One problem with the paper is that, IMO, it confuses companies using
OXML because "we live in a Microsoft world" versus it actually being a
better format. Assuming all the data is correct, and companies do lean
(slightly, may I add), towards OXML, that could be (probably is) simply
a reflection of Microsoft being a monopoly.

Cheers,
Daniel.

On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 15:01 +1100, Michael Carden wrote:
> Possibly mentioned here already and I missed it.
> 
> http://openxmldeveloper.org/archive/2006/11/27/IDC_Open_Document_Standards.aspx
> 
> 
> Link supplied by our local MS sales person. Maybe that's why I detect a certain bias to the paper.
> 
> MC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
-- 
"I AM in shape. Round IS a shape."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061204/1637e628/attachment-0001.pgp